In a small city as we see in the time of Socrates, the affairs were actually conducted by eldery citizens except slaves and women. Democracy is in fact the rule of majority. His character represents an ideal antagonist in a purely democratic society. He was seen with a contemptuous eye because often he challenged the established ideas inherently prevalent in the city. If we turn to Socrates' personality, we find that he was a public man of the city who had a habit of dealing with matters of the day with crude reason. In a purely democratic setting of Athens, any citizen can bring charges against his contemporary and prosecute him.Īthens as a society was inhabited by cantankerous individuals who were proud hearted about honouring their Gods and Goddesses. However, neither Meletus nor other accusers were professional prosecutors. His accusers, primarily Meletus, pressed against him with the charges of impiety and corrupting the youth of Athens. Socrates was the first distinguished man who was brought to court and convicted in a purely democratic setting. How can one wise man resist the will of the multitude?
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |